LOW REPULSION MATTRESS TOPPER MF6 S M2302

I bought this for my son, who said his bed mattress had gone flat and his back was aching. He is very happy with how soft and comfortable it is.

At first, I tried a topper with a thickness of 2.5 cm, but it was too thin, so I switched to this one with a thickness of 4 cm. It's a comfortable, soft mattress that doesn't bother me even though it's a low-rebound mattress. It's comfortable because it doesn't sink so much that it's hard to turn over in bed, even though it's a low-rebound mattress. However, it seems that urethane material is weak against heat, so I think a futon dryer is not a good idea.

I had been using a pocket coil mattress from Nitori for many years, but after gaining weight after having a baby, I started to wake up with a sore back more often, so I bought this product, which my husband had been using for many years. First of all, the pain in my back really went away. I can get up easily, so it's very comfortable, but because it's so smooth, the sheets roll up 150%. Even box sheets can be rolled up, and sheets with elastic corners can be stretched so much that the elastic seems about to break and the sheet slips. If anything, the mattress itself slips. (My husband's seems like it might slip off too.) The performance is great, but because it's so slippery, there are many times when it irritates me... I'm wondering whether to put something non-slip in between.

I put it on top of a mattress that supports my lower back. It helped to relieve my stiff shoulders and back, and sleeping on my side was easier. I slept well. I'm glad I bought it.

When I searched online, I found that urethane mattresses are required to have a recovery rate listed on the tag. So I opened the cover and looked at the tag, and it said “recovery rate 99.6% / hardness 53N”. A recovery rate of 99.6% can be called high performance. Why isn't this listed in the product specifications? The hardness (N) is also an important guide when purchasing. Furthermore, I would like to see the “density (D)” listed as well. I wonder if this is because of manufacturing variation and it is not consistent? Many customers buy this product believing that it is worth the price. That is why I want them to include performance specifications. This product is also worth the price. It is moderately soft with a hardness of 53N. If you are a 68kg overweight person, the waist part will sink 15mm~20mm. If you are heavier, I think a 4cm thickness would be better. It is soft and conforms to your body, but it also has a moderate level of resilience, so you can still turn over normally. I was using a firmer topper, but after changing to this, the muscle pain on my back has gone away. Performance is 5 stars. Insufficient labeling means 3 stars.